Sorry I don't I use Netscape Messenger myself.

Ian Burgmyer wrote:

> Thanks for the compliment :)
>
> Btw, I DO attach the images.  Unless Outlook Express is being a huge pain in
> the butt.  Grrr. . .I set it to plain text too.  Any ideas?
>
> -Ian with a growl
>
> Thomas Lake <tla### [at] homecom> wrote in message
> news:37238BA0.4BAE2AED@home.com...
> > I like this image. The lens flare you used really helps to give an
> impression of
> > a BRIGHT light, I fell like squinting just looking at it. I too have to
> note the
> > textures but since you just slapped then together I won't make a big deal
> about
> > it. One thing though, please try and attach all your images to any posts
> and not
> > make then inline images, some people don't have the latest browser and
> can't see
> > these.
> >
> > Ian Burgmyer wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, there is more detail in my second image, the vase, then meets the
> eye!
> > > There IS a ceiling light (and a so-so ceiling texture) and you can check
> it
> > > out right HERE.
> > >
> > > -Ian
> > >
> > > P.S. Yes, I AM obsessed with lens flare :)  I've always wanted em in
> POV-Ray
> > > ever since I've seen an OEM of the 3D accelerated game Incoming that
> came
> > > with my computer :)
> > >
> > > P.P.S. The scene file used to generate this image is the SAME as the
> vase
> > > one, except I changed the cameras around (there's actually been two
> every
> > > since I started on the light)
> > >
> > >  [Image]
> >

Post a reply to this message